Amores Perros (2000) from Johnny Web (Uncle Scoopy; Greg Wroblewski) |
Quite a few people compared this Mexican film to Pulp Fiction, and I guess that the comparison has some basis in structure. In essence, the film is a wheel built around a hub. The hub, shown immediately as the film begins and then again several times during the film, is a car crash. From that hub, we see three spokes pushing out in several directions, all involving people (and dogs) who came together in that crash. One of the spokes moves to the past, and covers a story that essentially ends with the crash. One of the spokes moves to the future, and covers a story that takes place almost completely after the crash. The third story occurs before and after the crash, showing how the crash changed the lives of the participant. There is some overlap and intersection in the stories, but not much. |
One of the cars contained
two aimless street boys and a fighting dog.
The second car contained a supermodel whose career was destroyed by the crash. The third story was about an amoral homeless man who is a professional killer, a former guerilla fighter. In the general confusion, he removed money and the injured fighting dog from the scene of the accident. |
|
Apart form certain
structural similarities, this is not a Tarantino clone, for several
reasons:
1. The entire point of the genre of pulp fiction is escapist fantasy, featuring characters like Tarzan, Conan, the re-animator, Sam Spade, and over-the-top gangsters. Nothing in a pulp novel or movie ever has happened or ever could. The characters never have existed and presumably never will. They exist in a special universe where the guys are extra tough, and the blondes are extra curvy and dangerous. The entire genre is a masturbatory fantasy for 12 year old boys of all ages, and is not meant to be taken any more seriously than this week's issue of Weekly World News. Amores Perros is not really escapist material. It is gritty street drama based on real life in Mexico City. 2. Tarantino's films, and films which he has inspired, are not about the world at all. A character in Pulp Fiction has no knowledge of the history of the world, except what has been portrayed in the films. Other films represent his universe. Nobody in a Tarantino film should remind you of anyone you have even known. Rather, they remind you of other fictional characters. That is the post-modernist world they inhabit. Amores Perros is not in that world. It is violent, but it is not really sensationalist violence. It bears less resemblance to a Tarantino film than it does to an inner-city emergency room on Friday night. 3. Pulp novels and films are entertainments, with no deep thoughts to impart. This movie has a lot of thinking behind it. Some examples:
|
|||||
|
Did I mention that it is a
helluva good movie? Dramatic visuals, interesting musical score. In a
more typical year, this might have won the Oscar for best
foreign-language film, but it obviously had no chance to compete with
the juggernaut that was Crouching Tiger.
The only real complaint that I have is that I think I missed a lot of the flavor of it. I'm generally OK with Spanish-language movies when it's Castillian Spanish, or when the characters are from educated families, or when the dialects aren't too heavy, but many of these characters spoke a kind of vulgar urban street dialect that left me lost half of the time, looking for the sub-titles. Imagine a street rapper, except in Spanish. And from what I could understand, the sub-titles may not always have gotten the flavor right. If you just don't like subtitled movies, you can choose a dubbed track instead, but I didn't get a chance to try that. |
||||
|
Return to the Movie House home page