|
It is probably the best of the
three TV movies, for what that's worth, but the marketing is pure
hokum. The box says "features explicit and uncensored footage not
seen in the original television broadcast. Bonus material: additional
nude scenes within the movie"
This extra material is, in fact, a
damned hot sex scene between Drew and the actor playing Buttafuoco,
while re-enacting Amy's version of the story, but the nudity consists
of very brief looks at extreme close-ups, and those body parts could
belong to just about anybody except Marlon Brando. In the shots where
the audience can clearly identify Barrymore, she has all vital parts
covered. She wears a dress in the scene.
|
The
Critics Vote
|
The People
Vote ...
- With their
dollars ... made for broadcast TV
|
IMDb
guideline: 7.5 usually indicates a level of
excellence, about like three and a half stars
from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm
watchability, about like two and a half stars
from the critics. The fives are generally not
worthwhile unless they are really your kind of
material, about like two stars from the critics.
Films under five are generally awful even if you
like that kind of film, equivalent to about one
and a half stars from the critics or less,
depending on just how far below five the rating
is. My own
guideline: A means the movie is so good it
will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not
good enough to win you over if you hate the
genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an
open mind about this type of film. C means it will only
appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover
appeal. D means you'll hate it even if you
like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if
you love the genre. F means that the film is not only
unappealing across-the-board, but technically
inept as well.
Based on this
description, this film is a C. It's a watchable TV
movie-of-the-week from 1992.
|
|