When Doris Duke died in 1993, she was one of the richest women in 
          the world and a highly respected philanthropist. She was the sole heir 
          of the tobacco fortune established by her father and grandfather. 
          Grandpa was THE Duke, as in Duke University. Doris left behind one of 
          the most famous wills in recent history, a sort of honest-to-goodness, 
          perfectly valid, equivalent of the Howard Hughes / Melvin Dummar will, in that she left a vast sum of 
          money to her gay butler and made him the trustee of all of her 
          foundations.
          This film is an attempt to explain that action.
          A rather poor attempt.
          The opening credits inform us that, "Part of the story is based on 
          fact. And part is not." That alone should be a red flag warning us 
          that the bull is about to be shot in profuse quantities. If the 
          bullshit alone were the problem, I would not really be complaining. 
          After all, such historical speculations are commonplace and will 
          continue to be despite my distaste for them. Where the film really 
          falls down is that it completely ignores the specific portion of 
          Doris's life when she actually re-wrote the will in favor of her 
          butler. There's no attempt to show how she made that decision, or what 
          went through her mind as she considered it. There's no attempt to show 
          the reactions of her lawyer or lawyers. The entire film concentrates 
          only on various anecdotes concerning Doris and her butler, and as the 
          title card warns us, many of those anecdotes are imaginary.
          In other words, it's a film about why a rich woman re-wrote a will to 
          favor her butler, but it has no scenes which dramatize the creation of 
          the will or the thought process behind it, and the scenes which are in 
          the film are often imaginary.
          What's even worse, the scenes aren't that interesting either.
          Based on the value of the superficial script, this would be just 
          another slapdash, sensationalized made-for-TV quickie except that the 
          specific TV channel which made it is the prestigious HBO. Such is the 
          respect accorded that company that two distinguished A-list actors 
          accepted the roles of Doris Duke (Susan Sarandon) and the gay Irish 
          butler (Ralph Fiennes). OK, then it has that goin' for it. But strip 
          away Fiennes and Sarandon, and what's left is a project which was just 
          not worth doing in the first place.
          . 
          
          
                If you are not familiar with our grading system, you need to 
                read the 
          explanation, because the grading is not linear. For example, by 
                our definition, a 
                C is solid and a C+ is a VERY good movie. There are very few Bs 
                and As. Based on our descriptive system, this film is a: