The
Critics Vote
General consensus: a hair less than three
stars. Ebert 3/4, Berardinelli 3/4, BBC 3/5,
filmcritic.com 4/5
|
The People
Vote ...
- with their dollars: it did fairly well in
limited distribution within the U.K. - close to a million
dollars on only 30 screens, but couldn't get started
anywhere else. Spain and the USA - about $125,000 each.
|
IMDb
guideline: 7.5 usually indicates a level of
excellence, about like three and a half stars
from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm
watchability, about like two and a half stars
from the critics. The fives are generally not
worthwhile unless they are really your kind of
material, about like two stars from the critics.
Films under five are generally awful even if you
like that kind of film, equivalent to about one
and a half stars from the critics or less,
depending on just how far below five the rating
is. My own
guideline: A means the movie is so good it
will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not
good enough to win you over if you hate the
genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an
open mind about this type of film. C means it will only
appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover
appeal. D means you'll hate it even if you
like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if
you love the genre. F means that the film is not only
unappealing across-the-board, but technically
inept as well.
Based on this description, this
film is a C+. For those who like off-beat
comedy, this is a must. For those who don't, it will probably
not please.
|