|
He needs a companion on his arm for parties, and a
regular sex partner. For this, he is willing to help out with
finances. He has Strömmerstedt in mind, but Strömmerstedt hits on the
bright idea of giving him Inga.
I hesitate to give away the ending, as it is
something of a surprise, and this film is well worth renting, if only
for its historical importance. Strömmerstedt shows her buns twice,
Liljedahl, in her first of 8 roles in the genre, shows breasts and
buns, and a hint of bush through a nightgown, and three unidentified
women show breasts. There was a good deal of nostalgia here, with
mini-skirts, short-shorts, and a freewheeling sexual attitude. |
The
Critics Vote
|
The People
Vote ...
|
IMDb
guideline: 7.5 usually indicates a level of
excellence, about like three and a half stars
from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm
watchability, about like two and a half stars
from the critics. The fives are generally not
worthwhile unless they are really your kind of
material, about like two stars from the critics.
Films under five are generally awful even if you
like that kind of film, equivalent to about one
and a half stars from the critics or less,
depending on just how far below five the rating
is. My own
guideline: A means the movie is so good it
will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not
good enough to win you over if you hate the
genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an
open mind about this type of film. C means it will only
appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover
appeal. D means you'll hate it even if you
like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if
you love the genre. F means that the film is not only
unappealing across-the-board, but technically
inept as well.
Based on this description,
I give this a full C+, the highest possible for a
soft-X adult film. It is a good bet for couples, and has plenty
of plot to go with the sex and nudity.
|
|