| Critics are pretty much in agreement that this
        is a 4 star effort. Even though it is a little rough
        around the edges, partly because of a low budget
        ($150,000.00), it shows the emergence of a Scorsese
        style. This is a must see for the serious filmgoer. Scoop's note: I
        won't disagree with Tuna's assertion that you should see
        the movie if you are a serious film buff, but I think the
        reasons are: 
        
            - It
                showed what a great director's work looked like
                in its earlier stages.
 
            - It
                represented a real breakthrough at the time for
                personal filmmaking.
 
            - Its
                techniques and themes provided the jumping-off
                point for Scorsese's career as well as an inspiration for many other
                subsequent filmmakers. 
 
            - It
                introduced De Niro, Keitel and Scorsese to
                mainstream audiences.
 
         
         | 
    
    
        
            
                DVD info from Amazon.  
                
                    Widescreen letterboxed,
                        1.85:1, plus a fullscreen version 
                     
                    mono sound, no special
                        features 
                     
                 
                 | 
             
         
         | 
        It's my
        opinion that the four star reviews are for Scorsese's
        career, not for this film. It is a good early movie made
        by a director who would become great. I think Scorsese
        probably regrets some of the techniques he used here.
        (Like the filtered lenses) The DVD is a real disappointment.
        I'm not sure how much is lost on the DVD compared to the
        theatrical presentation, but the sound is poor, and the film is sometimes
        blurry and undercontrasted. 
        The DVD
        letterboxed version simply blocks off information at the
        top and bottom of the full screen version, and the matting
        is not done exactly right, because the ratio is not
        exactly 1.85 
         | 
    
    
        
            
                The
                Critics Vote 
                
                 | 
                The People
                Vote ...  
                
                    - With their
                        votes ... IMDB summary: IMDb voters
                        score it 7.6, not far from the top 250. 
 
                 
                 | 
             
            
                | IMDb
                guideline: 7.5 usually indicates a level of
                excellence, about like three and a half stars
                from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm
                watchability, about like two and a half stars
                from the critics. The fives are generally not
                worthwhile unless they are really your kind of
                material, about like two stars from the critics.
                Films under five are generally awful even if you
                like that kind of film, equivalent to about one
                and a half stars from the critics or less,
                depending on just how far below five the rating
                is. | 
             
         
         |