The Model Solution (2002) from Tuna

The Model Solution (2002 video) is a soft core with scarcely enough plot for a hard core film. Remove the nudity, and simulated sex, and you would probably have less than 10 minutes of footage remaining. Two modeling agencies are competing for a lucrative lingerie catalogue contract. The competitors are former partners and former lovers, and have been head to head frequently since their split. That is pretty much the plot.

NUDITY REPORT

see the main commentary
Eight women have sex, and show all three Bs, and most of them also show gyno shots. They are:

Sasha Rochelle - 5 credits under the name Sasha Peralto
Diana Espen - 4 credits at IMDB
Kimberlie Castaic - I credit at IMDB (not including this film)
Holly Hollywood - 5 credits including this one
Kim Laurel - No Credits
Katie Lohmann - 6 Credits at IMDB
Kitana Baker - 1 Credit at IMDB (not including this film)
Regina Russell - 18 credits at IMDB

no DVD info available
Most of these women have worked before for Writer/director/producer Edward Holzman, who has made 31 such films, the only one familiar to me is I like to Play Games Too. Four other women also show the 3 Bs in small parts as models. 

The Critics Vote

  • no reviews on line

The People Vote ...

  • IMDB summary. incomplete cast listing, not enough votes for a rating.
IMDb guideline: 7.5 usually indicates a level of excellence, about like three and a half stars from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm watchability, about like two and a half stars from the critics. The fives are generally not worthwhile unless they are really your kind of material, about like two stars from the critics. Films under five are generally awful even if you like that kind of film, equivalent to about one and a half stars from the critics or less, depending on just how far below five the rating is.

My own guideline: A means the movie is so good it will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not good enough to win you over if you hate the genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an open mind about this type of film. C means it will only appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover appeal. D means you'll hate it even if you like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if you love the genre. F means that the film is not only unappealing across-the-board, but technically inept as well.

Based on this description, as a mainstream film, this is a D, with no plot at all. Is is well photographed, and the sex scenes are in good light, do not use excessive lighting and camera effects, and are well choreographed. They include a shower nozzle masturbation scene and a girl-girl. If you are looking for lots of attractive naked people doing the nasty, this is a good bet, and so is probably a C as a soft-core sex film.

Return to the Movie House home page