The Order (2003) from Johnny Web (Uncle Scoopy; Greg Wroblewski) |
According to the
Rotten Tomatoes site, this was one of the ten worst-reviewed
wide releases of 2003 (forty or more reviews), That places it in
some very impressive company.
This film was originally to be called The Sin Eater, which would have made a lot more sense in two ways:
Unless you are thinking about Jean Claude Van Damme, in which case you are probably on the wrong web site, I'll bet you're now thinking, "what the hell is a sin-eater, anyway"? Fair question. It's another one of those far-fetched "ecclesiastical horror" concepts based upon some obscure element of dogma or myth. In this case, the sin-eater premise is about half dogmatic (or rather it's about misunderstood and misapplied dogma), and half mythical. The Dogma: Since the Catholic Church excommunicates people, and preaches (or has preached in the past) that eternal salvation is not possible outside the Church, some people assume that excommunication is equivalent to damnation. If Catholic teaching is applied correctly and compassionately, that is not true. While excommunicates are denied salvation and the sacraments (most importantly the purification rituals of last rites and confession), there is theoretically no such thing as a state or place beyond God's forgiveness. The Catholic Encyclopedia explains it as follows:
It is important to remember, however, that dogma is not always applied correctly. The Catholic Church is an institution run by men, and those human men make mistakes, sometimes even commit evil acts of their own. The propensity for abuse was far greater in the Middle Ages, when the Pope of one all-too-earthly family might excommunicate a member of a rival family, then staunchly deny readmission to the Church, no matter what. In such a case, excommunication would be equivalent to damnation. How, then, might the excommunicate find a way to heaven, if it could not be done through the Church, through the sacraments, or even through the holiest of lives? Furthermore, the Church has never had an open policy toward suicide. It is a mortal sin, and since it is the final act of life, it occurs too late for forgiveness to be applicable. In theory, there doesn't seem to be a way, within the parameters of Catholic orthodoxy, for someone to commit suicide and avoid hell. This fact sometimes led to desperation in the grieving family of one who has committed suicide. Given those ostensibly redoubtable barriers to salvation, it stands to reason that folk tales would spring up among grassroots Catholics about "back doors" to heaven outside the Church. (Personally, I don't think it would be worth believing in a God who can be so easily tricked! For all his unrepentant philandering, Captain Kirk could sneak past such a God simply by using the Mudd's Robots trick.) The Myth: Among the Celtic peoples, there was a long-standing custom involving sin-eaters. Nobody knows exactly how it all started, but the gist of it is that the sin-eater would attend the final ceremony for the recently deceased, and eat food that had been touching the dead body. In such a way, the sin-eater would ceremonially cleanse the last sins from the departed, allowing his or her soul to proceed directly to heaven. I have read that the custom still persists among some of the descendants of Celtic peoples who settled in the Appalachian Mountains.
Interestingly, many reference sources say that a virtually identical ritual was practiced in parts of India, so there is nothing uniquely Christian about the belief. It's just one of those instances of folklore becoming custom. This movie combines the dogma and the myth. The premise is that the unforgivable, those who cannot receive salvation through the Church, must turn to the mythical sin-eaters. In this particular reworking of the myth, the sin-eater does not necessarily wait until death. He is called for by the unforgivable person himself, usually from that person's deathbed. I suppose you can guess that eating all those sins has to have an impact on the eater as well:
The movie begins as Heath Ledger, playing a young priest from a truly obscure order - they only have three members - finds out that his mentor has died. Oops. Make that two members. So the two remaining "Carolingians", Heath Ledger and the fat guy from The Full Monty, meet in Rome to investigate the death of their beloved leader. The fat guy is really not any help in this investigation, since he spends the entire film skulking around, holding a cross in front of him, mumbling in Aramaic, and constantly spinning around to make sure that no demons sneak up behind him. So Heath is sort of on his own. Heath finds out that the old fella used a sin-eater, presumably because Carolingians are considered heretics, have thus been excommunicated, and will not repent because ... well, because they're right, dammit, and the Church is wrong! How does Heath know about the sin-eater? They leave behind tell-tale signs, like cracker crumbs, and silver candy wrappers, and empty cans of that spray-on cheese spread. Blah ... blah ... yadda ... yadda. |
Skip through the set-up , and it all turns out to be a three-way power struggle among Heath, the immortal sin-eater, and Robocop. Robocop is now Robocardinal, an evil chain-smoking heretic who seems likely to become the next Pope - "the warrior pope" as he calls himself, or Robopope for short. After some evil minions of Robopope kill the Full Monty guy, Heath's only ally is a woman he once exorcised, who has only recently been released from a mental institution. Long gone are the days when people were released from institutions with a baggy suit and twenty bucks, because this woman has apparently been released with a designer wardrobe that would make Jackie Kennedy envious. In fact, she looks so good that Heath screws her socks off, and we begin to see why those Carolingians are considered to be heretics by the mainstream Catholics. |
|
|
The final complication is that the sin-eater is actually not that bad a guy, is really pretty darned sick of sin-eating, and would like it very much if Heath would take over his responsibilities for a few centuries. He tells a few zany anecdotes about the good times with Caravaggio to illustrate how great immortality can be, but Heath is not easily persuaded, so all parties must proceed to their destinies through more circuitous routes. |
||||
|
Return to the Movie House home page