At about the same time, his 16 year old nephew
shows up on his doorstep, and ol' 40ish Roger Dodger undertakes to
give the lad a one night crash course in how to get laid in New York City. They have
about a forty minute conversation with two young eligibles (Jennifer
Beals and Elizabeth Berkley), during which the two sophisticated
ladies take a real shine to the nephew for his sincerity and smarts.
The kid has a chance to take advantage of the two. They are
reasonably enthusiastic about his sexual education, and his uncle
has played bad cop to make it look like the nephew needs a place to
stay. The nephew, however, is a good person and can't bring himself
to use dishonesty as a tactic. |
DVD info from Amazon
-
Commentary by director Dylan
Kidd and director of photography Joaquin Baca-Asay
-
Commentary by director Dylan
Kidd, Campbell Scott, and Jesse Eisenberg
-
Director's preface to the
special features
-
Examination of a scene: Opaline
-
New York at Night: The Roger
Dodger Walking Tour with Jesse Eisenberg
-
deleted scene
-
Player's Guide to Scoring with
Women
-
Widescreen anamorphic format,
1.85
|
|
As the evening progresses, Roger shows the kid how
to prepare for the later stages of an evening's hunting expedition.
- Penultimate step: what to do with the
passed-out women late in the evening. The kid fails this test as
well, allowing the gorgeous knockout to pass out fully dressed and
unravaged.
- Last step: the assembly line bordello.
In the final 15 minutes of the film, cynical Roger
has to redeem himself, at least partially, to prevent his nephew's
life from going in the wrong direction.
Pretty good flick! Not much happens, other than
what I just told you. It is very chatty, but the conversations sound
like real people talking. Roger, the kid, and the two ladies are
characters who seem to say the things that those characters really
would say in that situation, and the things they say are interesting
and sometimes challenging. Helluva good first film for auteur Dylan
Kidd, and a tremendously full featured DVD. |
The
Critics Vote
|
The People
Vote ...
-
The box office was only $1.2 million, despite some good word
of mouth in NY and LA
|
The meaning of the IMDb
score: 7.5 usually indicates a level of
excellence equivalent to about three and a half stars
from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm
watchability, comparable to approximately two and a half stars
from the critics. The fives are generally not
worthwhile unless they are really your kind of
material, equivalent to about a two star rating from the critics.
Films rated below five are generally awful even if you
like that kind of film - this score is roughly equivalent to one
and a half stars from the critics or even less,
depending on just how far below five the rating
is. My own
guideline: A means the movie is so good it
will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not
good enough to win you over if you hate the
genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an
open mind about this type of film. C means it will only
appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover
appeal. (C+ means it has no crossover appeal, but
will be considered excellent by genre fans, while
C- indicates that it we found it to
be a poor movie although genre addicts find it watchable). D means you'll hate it even if you
like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if
you love the genre. F means that the film is not only
unappealing across-the-board, but technically
inept as well.
Any film rated C- or better is recommended for
fans of that type of film. Any film rated B- or better is
recommended for just about anyone. We don't score films below C-
that often, because we like movies and we think that most of
them have at least a solid niche audience. Now that you know
that, you should have serious reservations about any movie below
C-.
Based on this description, this
film is a
C+. Although it feels like a play more than a
movie, it is a witty and interesting look at the battle of the
sexes.
|
|