The film runs 124 minutes, and is rated X, but is not a hard core,
although it gets rather close at times. Indeed, it might be called a
musical, in that many scenes take place with a lively piano
accompaniment, and Madam Kitty sings several torch songs. The set
design is interesting, start to finish.
|
DVD info from Amazon
-
This is a very impressive DVD
set, which includes a second disk of interviews, and a .pdf
file of a book written around the movie, sort of like a 78
page lobby card.
-
Bonus Disc: Inside Salon
Kitty - Interview with Director Tinto Brass
-
Designing Salon Kitty -
Interview with Production Designer Ken Adam
-
Radio Spots
-
Poster & Still Gallery
-
Ken Adam's Production Designs
-
Jost Jakob's Costume Designs
-
The Story of Salon Kitty
(DVD-ROM)
-
Widescreen anamorphic format
|
|
White Trash Devil summed up the influence of this film as
follows:
In the mid 1970's a whole slew
of World War 2-themed Sexploitation films were churned out ...
from Italy, in the wake of the highly successful Ilsa, She Wolf
of the SS. In Italy these films are known as part of the "il
sadiconazista" cycle, the bulk of which were influenced as much by
Ilsa as they were by ... controversial Italian art-house
films: Liliana Cavani’s The Night Porter, Tinto Brass’s
Salon Kitty.
These film makers had discovered
that it was easier to get violently sexual situations past the
censors if they were presented within the context of having basis
in the historical facts of Nazi war atrocities. Of course, none of
these films had any interest in being factually correct. The
filmmakers were solely interested in making a few bucks by
exploiting 1970's movie audiences' craving for weirder and wilder
psycho-sexual delights. These films pushed the boundaries of bad
taste to their lowest limit. Though sex, swastikas, and Sadism
sold lots of tickets for Ilsa and Salon Kitty, the
other entries in the genre were generally box-office bombs, which
meant that by the 1980's no more of these films were being
produced. It is difficult to pinpoint the appeal of these films.
Any first year psychology student could interpret these films'
appeal in relation to bondage fetishes, rape fantasies, misogygny,
etc.
More likely, the fundamental
appeal is simply the fact that a whole slew of beautiful women get
naked frequently.
|
The
Critics Vote
General UK consensus: two
stars. Mail 4/10, Telegraph 4/10, Independent 4/10, Guardian
2/10, Times 6/10, Sun 5/10, Express 6/10, BBC 3/5
|
The People
Vote ...
-
Box Office Mojo. It was budgeted at $47 million for
production, and the distribution/advertising costs are
estimated around $30 million. It did nine million in its
first five days, in 2400 theaters. (On the average, the
studios get about 55% of box office receipts, the theater
owners 45%.)
|
The meaning of the IMDb
score: 7.5 usually indicates a level of
excellence equivalent to about three and a half stars
from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm
watchability, comparable to approximately two and a half stars
from the critics. The fives are generally not
worthwhile unless they are really your kind of
material, equivalent to about a two star rating from the critics,
or a C- from our system.
Films rated below five are generally awful even if you
like that kind of film - this score is roughly equivalent to one
and a half stars from the critics or a D on our scale. (Possibly even less,
depending on just how far below five the rating
is. My own
guideline: A means the movie is so good it
will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not
good enough to win you over if you hate the
genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an
open mind about this type of film. C means it will only
appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover
appeal. (C+ means it has no crossover appeal, but
will be considered excellent by genre fans, while
C- indicates that it we found it to
be a poor movie although genre addicts find it watchable). D means you'll hate it even if you
like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if
you love the genre. F means that the film is not only
unappealing across-the-board, but technically
inept as well. Any film rated C- or better is recommended for
fans of that type of film. Any film rated B- or better is
recommended for just about anyone. We don't score films below C-
that often, because we like movies and we think that most of
them have at least a solid niche audience. Now that you know
that, you should have serious reservations about any movie below
C-.
Based on this description, this
film gets the highest possible grade for this genre, C+. It has
a plot, decent acting, impressive music, great visuals, more
tits than a Girls Gone Wild video, and more bush than Australia.
|
|