DVD info from Amazon
• Commentary by Stan Winston and Shane Mahan
• Making of featurette
• Photo gallery
• Widescreen anamorphic format, 1.85
|
|
Up until that point, it was a pretty stylish little
film, with some very impressive set design, creepy fog-bound
atmosphere, and a great look and feel
reminiscent of the best old creature classics. The cast was surprisingly
good for a made-for-cable monster movie. Rufus Sewell and Carla Gugino
come up with some crazy accents and convincing characters. At that
point the film was going for "eerie" and mysterious".
Unfortunately, once the mermaid transforms into a
scaly and powerful beast and starts chowing down on the entire male
population of the ship, then it just becomes your usual "die in nasty
ways" movie, albeit without Brave Sir Robin.
Surprisingly, this version of the mermaid legend
creates sexual tension between the mermaid and female humans,
which definitely qualifies this as the Citizen Kane of evil lesbian
mermaid films.
Premiered on cable TV
|
Tuna's Thoughts
|
She Creature (2001) is a made for
cable that, for me at least, rises well above the usual monster
gore-fest. A tiny carny freak-show in turn of the century
Ireland, on their last night, is introduced to a real mermaid by
an elderly man, who was afraid that their mermaid in the show
was a real one, and wanted to warn them about the dangers. Being
good carneys, they steal the mermaid, reinforced glass tank and
all, and board a ship for America and fame and fortune with
Ringling Brothers. They also take a journal kept by the man's
wife.
Once aboard ship, they learn the hard way about the nature of
mermaids. Seems mermaids, sirens, Circes, Lorelies, etc are all
the same creature, and have a damned good reason for luring
sailors. They love seafood. The stolen mermaid, it turns out, is
the chief gatherer for the colony. She is shape-shifting,
telepathic, and has lesbian tendencies. This was, I thought, a
very original slant on myths and legends. The other thing that
impressed me was the great visuals, atmosphere, and make-up
effects. Rya Kihlstedt, who was topless through the entire film,
was the best looking mermaid effect I have yet seen in a film.
Yes, it is a gore monster movie, but with some very strong
elements. C+.
|
|
The
Critics Vote
|
The People
Vote ...
|
IMDb
guideline: 7.5 usually indicates a level of
excellence, about like three and a half stars
from the critics. 6.0 usually indicates lukewarm
watchability, about like two and a half stars
from the critics. The fives are generally not
worthwhile unless they are really your kind of
material, about like two stars from the critics.
Films under five are generally awful even if you
like that kind of film, equivalent to about one
and a half stars from the critics or less,
depending on just how far below five the rating
is. My own
guideline: A means the movie is so good it
will appeal to you even if you hate the genre. B means the movie is not
good enough to win you over if you hate the
genre, but is good enough to do so if you have an
open mind about this type of film. C means it will only
appeal to genre addicts, and has no crossover
appeal. D means you'll hate it even if you
like the genre. E means that you'll hate it even if
you love the genre. F means that the film is not only
unappealing across-the-board, but technically
inept as well.
Based on this description, this
film is a C+. (Tuna agrees) If you like monster movies, you'll find it to be a
stylish one. I don't like monster movies, and it had no humor,
so it was a tedious experience for me, enlivened only by
Kihlstedt's nudity and the high-concept sets.
|
|