Students rioted against the old
restrictions, against the war, against anything.
Bombs went off in the dean's office, students
occupied the administration building. The
activists took personal and sometimes violent
action against the most despised hall monitors.
Men who had held dictatorial control over our
lives mere days before now lived in fear of their
lives. There were hall monitors who tried to
cling to the old rules and to do their jobs. They
thought everything would soon return to normal,
to the way it had been for a century. They
thought there was no way that a way of life
exists for a century, then changes in a couple of
days. They were wrong. Guys beat them up, killed
their pets, and drove them forcibly from their
own rooms. All the rules were really torn up
overnight, and all the king's horses and all the
king's men couldn't put Humpty together again. By
Thanksgiving of 1967, we had no restrictions on
when we could leave or return, no limitations on
women or alcohol in the dorms. Alcohol was
relegated to minor importance by then. Guys were
openly smoking joints at parties and card games.
All this change happened in a few weeks. I'll
leave it up to sociologists and social historians
to tell you why these things happened. The
Vietnam war and the draft process, which required
our involuntary participation in that war, were
important catalysts, but it's too simplistic to
try to establish a direct causality. The
important thing is that freedom happened so
suddenly, and we didn't know how to be free, so
we went insane with drugs and sex and skipping
classes and radical politics and playing cards
all night, and whatever else we could think of.
I
like to think that the most amazing thing about
my generation was the speed at which we lost our
innocence. My senior ball in 1966 was all white
bucks and clean living. Two years later, everyone
I knew was either in Vietnam, praying to come
home, or taking drugs, praying not to go there.
Guys who couldn't name the U.S President in 1967
had pictures of obscure. Latin American
revolutionaries on their walls in 1968. Many of
my old friends weren't talking to each other
because of their divisions over America's role in
Southeast Asia.
This
cultural revolution started, albeit slowly, to
affect the movie industry. The pragmatic
businessmen in the industry started to view the
new generation as an important target market, and
realized that it was now possible to market
virtually mainstream movies with new levels of
sexual explicitness. But it takes time to make
movies, so American businessmen started first to
market some existing product - dreadful European
films which had some sex and flesh in them (ala
"I Am Curious, Yellow"), and then to
fund new projects which would pander to those in
our generation who wanted to stretch out our
newly discovered wings. In this next wave came
Therese and Isabelle, one of the first explicit
movies to play in mainstream theaters to normal
and "nice" suburban audiences.
There
is just no way my prose can convey what it was
like to go into a non-porn theater, the same
theaters where our moms and dads had taken us to
see "Old Yeller", and see scenes like
this. They may seem conservative by later
standards, but these were shocking to us as we
emerged from our Howdy Doody years. Therese and
Isabelle were two schoolgirls who began a love
affair. The story is told with delicacy, and
without sensationalism. Therese returns as an
adult to her childhood academy, and relives the
past in flashbacks as she walks around the
school. There is even a scene with both women
making passionate nice-nice. I was 18 or so when
I saw this. Many of us did not know such things
existed. I kinda sorta knew it existed, in
theory, but I wasn't sure exactly what it
entailed.
"Therese"
was also one of the later B&W movies, made by
the guy I like to think of us the world's most
stylish pornographer, Radley Metzger. Radley
could mimic the styles of the great European
directors, and shot his films in lavish settings.
He was also familiar with the artistic theories
of the stage masters like Pirandello, and
incorporated some of their concepts in his own
work. More to the point, many of can thank Radley
for our first real looks at T&A, and this
movie was one of the first major films with
nudity after the cultural revolution. I don't
remember now if Metzger was trying to sell
T&A by placing it in the context of a serious
movie, or if he really thought he was Fellini and
was just taking advantage of the new liberalism
to tell his story more explicitly
|